If “the Lamb of God…WAS SLAIN BEFORE THE DISRUPTION (katabole) OF THE WORLD” (Revelation 13:8), yet not ACTUALLY/HISTORICALLY SLAIN until the Cross, then would it not seem possible, even plausible, that Jesus was “BEGOTTEN BEFORE ALL AGES” (Nicene Creed), yet not ACTUALLY/HISTORICALLY BEGOTTEN/BORN until his conception/birth from Mary? Other Biblical considerations should be summoned as deciding factors in this case. [10/21/10]
Q: Why was it NECESSARY for Jesus to RISE AGAIN FROM THE DEAD?
A: In order to SATISFY God’s JUSTICE!
Explanation: The crucifixion of Jesus was a grave INJUSTICE, especially inasmuch as he was absolutely without sin, much less was he guilty of any capital crime. But, moreover, because Jesus was the Son of God, divine justice itself intervened on his behalf, yet not to avenge his wrongful death upon his slayers, but rather to gloriously UNDO THE DEATH WITH OVERCOMPENSATING JUDICIAL RESTITUTION, ALTHOUGH NOT FROM THE OFFENDERS, WHO WERE TOTALLY POWERLESS, OF COURSE, TO MAKE REPARATIONS FOR THEIR CAPITAL CRIME, BUT RATHER FROM GOD HIMSELF, ONE OF THE INJURED PARTIES (!), IN HIS GRATUITOUS GRACIOUSNESS AND AS THE ULTIMATE PROOF OF IT! [10/21/10;3/27/22]
The purpose and function of the climactic Messianic events of Israel’s inscripturated history was to GENERATE FAITH IN THE GRACIOUS FORGIVENESS/PARDON FROM ISRAEL’S GOD. The CRUCIFIXION AND RESURRECTION of Jesus of Nazareth jointly demonstrated both his identity as God’s unique Son, along with his Anointing to be Israel’s King, and also God’s justice toward him in reversing his unjust death, as well as God’s graciousness toward his killers (plus anyone less guilty, without distinction) in pardoning their aggravated crime without exacting a penalty, provided they repented. Apostolic testimony to these events and their divine interpretation from the lips of the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ supply corroborative force to create faith. [10/21/10]
Christ’s Resurrection was not ‘proof that the Cross had satisfied God’s punitive justice against sin’ but, much rather, was proof that God WAS EXTENDING PARDON to Christ’s murderers for what they did at the Cross, if they would accept it by faith. In other words, the Resurrection was the miraculous confirmation of the free, ‘UNPAID‘ FORGIVENESS THAT WAS TRANSPIRING EVERY MOMENT THAT JESUS SUFFERED ON THAT CROSS. For he might at any moment have pulled rank and called down Messianic protection and avenging, to which he had every right. Instead, he let go of his rights and suffered the inevitable consequences of his costly forgiveness, in solid expectation that his Father would respond in similar graciousness and freely overcompensate his losses, even to the unprecedented length of raising him from the dead and exalting him beyond all measure! [10/21/10; 3/27/22]
The fundamental purpose of Christ’s work was NOT TO MAKE SATISFACTION, but much rather, and most emphatically, TO RECEIVE SATISFACTION FOR THE INCOMPARABLE INJURY OF THE CROSS. And this, of course, was rendered to him AT HIS RESURRECTION BY “THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD” (in Paul’s specific contexts—and in delightfully revealing contradiction of the tendentiously skewed yet ubiquitous Protestant rendering of dikaiosune as “righteousness” instead of “justice” in our King James or ‘authorized’ English version—inclined exclusively toward the premial function of EXERTING JUSTICE toward others), followed up by his due enthronement in Heaven, plus the SUPERABUNDANT BESTOWAL OF THE HOLY SPIRIT TO HIS NEW FRIENDS! Now let’s feast! [10/24/10′ 3/27/22]