It’s Only Fair!

“The Bread from Heaven” eaten in the Lord’s Supper was likened by Jesus to the manna that miraculously fed Israel. A jar of that manna was kept in the Ark of the Covenant as a memorial to God’s miraculous sustaining of their lives/souls during their wilderness sojourn. That ark was covered by protective cherubim, overshadowing the solid gold protective cover (kapporeth / hilasterion) where “atonement” was made by the spattering of blood annually, and where Jehovah promised to meet His people—the earthly figure of His celestial throne.

These sorts of images or pictorial representations intermingle and mount and recombine and romp and play with one another in symbolic attempts to convey the heavenly truths that they never quite attain. But they do manage to teach that communion is a New Covenant incorporation of atonement—ingesting heavenly power to nourish our resistance/immunity to sin. (Baptism/immersion in like manner focuses on the complementary aspect—washing.) [6/12/09]

The disposition of Jesus’ flesh was enmity toward God, just as ours is (Romans 8:7). But he was not (as incarnated) responsible for that factual circumstance, any more than any of the rest of the human race is. He was, however, responsible for walking in the Spirit of life instead of in that mortal, sinful flesh of his. Thus Jesus never gave vent to his death-oriented flesh, but only to his life-oriented Spirit. And he has left us this example so that we might follow in his steps.

Moreover, at length, through his death on the Cross, Jesus killed the enmity in his flesh, condemning sin in it (Ephesians 2:16, 14, Romans 8:3, 7, Colossians 1:20-21) as well, via his resurrection, which, conversely, acquitted him and his Spirit (1 Timothy 3:16!). Thus Jesus’ flesh was condemned and his Spirit was justified all in one fell swoop at the ‘Crossurrection’ events. Accordingly, he won/acquired/procured (peripoi–) from God a whole new body! [6/14/09]

God was “in Christ” on the Cross and God was in Christ in the Unseen, in the Tomb…and beyond! That’s why Christ could declare, “I am laying down my soul that I may be getting it again. No one is taking it away from me, but I am laying it down of myself. I have the right to lay it down, and I have the right to get it again. This precept I got from my Father” (John 10:17-18). “Raze this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19). “I am the resurrection and the life” (John 11:25). [6/17/09]

God purposed Messiah Jesus “as a protective shelter…because of the passing over of the penalties-of-sins which occurred before in the forbearance of God” (Romans 3:25), that is, God’s righteous forbearance was being manifested or displayed precisely by his provision of a protective shield over sins justifying him in passing by their penalties! It was, of course, the faithfulness in Christ’s blood that elicited His resurrectionary display of justice toward him and his. [6/18/09]

Romans 1:17-18 distinguishes between “a righteousness of God”—namely GRACIOUSNESS (1:5; 3:24; 4:4-5, 15-16; 5:1-2; 1:7; 5:15-21; 6:14-15; 8:32-34)—which is “revealed from heaven” in historic outbreaks of divine judgment. Thus both the premial and the penal are in view, but with very different results! Paul expounds God’s penal justice in 1:18-3:20, in grim terms, but then turns on a dime to expound God’s premial justice in 3:21 onward, in glorious words. [6/18/09]

Whatever Jesus got by his faithfulness is what we, too, get by our faith. God reciprocated with outrageous graciousness to Jesus in just recompense for his faithfulness in obedience to Him. Thus it is only fair and right that all others who exert a like faith receive a like reward of graciousness. [6/18/09]

Rachel Joy Scott as “Sacrificial Lamb”

Rachel Joy Scott sacrificed herself—an innocent, good (even when her five “good” friends were not, and abandoned her), forgiving, kind, spotless virgin (decisively giving up her boyfriend and giving up the hope of marriage) lamb (“rachel” in Hebrew) to become a sin-offering (αμαρτια) as a protection, shelter, or shield (ιλαστηριον—“propitiatory shelter,” “mercy-seat“) concerning the sins or offenses of her high school (particularly bullying). Not only that, but also concerning the sins of her parents in divorcing.  Rachel’s willing, voluntary self-sacrifice in accordance with God’s desire, brought the overcompensation of God’s graciousness to her whole family, giving back to her father Darrell a vast ministry of salvation in high schools across the nation, along with her mother Beth (plus both of her parents’ new spouses), as well as her sisters and brothers.

Rachel Joy Scott, by her heroic self-sacrifice, also delivered Columbine High School from a manifold worse devastation than it did suffer in fact.  Bombs placed in the cafeteria refused to detonate, thus sparing hundreds of lives!  Only twelve students (“disciples”) and one teacher (“master”) died…although many more were wounded.

And God was pleased, well-pleased, propitious, gracious, and thousands more have been saved across the nation and beyond, as a consequence.  [4/21/06—the 7th anniversary of the Columbine massacre; 12/31/25]

God, throughout the Old Covenant with Israel, required that the regular sin-offerings employ a flawless lamb (a virgin animal), white (“without spot”).   Why?  Obviously, to depict sinlessness.  That being the case, the offering portrayed a sin against the creature itself—the harmless, amenable animal.  This ritual act, in effect, depicted wrong or injustice, per se.  In this precise way, the sin-offering (αμαρτια) truly did depict a sin (αμαρτια).

Thus did the sinless sacrificial victim bear “the string of sins,” in the words of Rachel Scott, Columbine High School martyr, leading up to its slaughter and death, by accepting all these injustices without complaint and without self-defense, vengeance, or retaliation.

Jesus had the right from his Father to not bear those brutal injustices—no one could have taken his life from him (John 10:17-18); he could have called more than twelve legions of angelic messengers to save himself if he had chosen.  (Matt. 26:52-54)  Yet many bystanders erroneously taunted, “Others he saves!  Himself he cannot save!”  (Matt. 27:42)  Not! Rather, he carries their “string of sins“/”strings of sin” without reviling and without threat (1 Peter 2:23-25).  By those savage “welts” we are healed (Isaiah 53:5), precisely because God avenged them by healing his flesh at resurrection, then proceeding to overcompensate him with superabundant  healing for us in the bargain!  (I love this Gospel, I do!)  Jesus’ only choices were to avenge himself or to bear those sinful assaults.  He willingly gave up what our sins had deprived him of.  He chose to not avenge himself, to not vindicate his own honor, to not use his own authority, which he had direct from his Father.  He laid it all down, surrendering himself instead into his Father’s hands—”Him Who is judging justly” (1 Peter 2:23).  And that would mean, in the meantime, surrendering himself to his vicious enemies whom he loved, many of whom, by his subsequently demonstrated mercy and  graciousness came to trust him after all and got saved!

The medieval notion that at the Cross God avenged His insulted honor is 180° backwards.  Messiah bore or carried that dishonor instead of avenging himself (although the legitimate authority to do so had never been, nor could ever be, taken from him). He waited for Jehovah’s righteous judgment to avenge the enormity.  It is from LOVE that the Savior died instead of lashing out in revenge to decimate his enemies.  The supernal wisdom behind love aims at “winning souls” back to amity and friendship.  God’s goal was not to incinerate the sinner but to conciliate the silly (from a word suggesting “deserving pity,” meaning feeble-minded, showing little sense, judgment, or sobriety; foolish, stupid, absurd, ludicrous, etc. [Colloq.]:  dazed, senseless, as from a blow.  [Dial.]:  helpless, weak.  [Archaic]:  feeble, infirm.  [Archaic]:  simple, plain, innocent.).

To conclude, the ancient sacrificial lamb, appointed by covenant and well-pleasing to God, got consumed by fire—burning wrath, anger, indignation, fury.  Yet dare we allege that these represented the disposition of God?  The cross of “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29, 36) illuminates the truth that yields the true interpretation.  That fiery holocaust depicts the furious hatred and wrath of Satan and the viciousness he propagates in the world.  Yet the smoke rises “into God’s nostrils” as a memorial testimony of faithfully obedient submission depicted and figured by the unblemished lamb.

The raising up of the serpent in the wilderness onto a pole (John 3:14) likewise graphically symbolized the future crucifixion as a heinous sin.  [4/21/06; 12/31/25]